Page 3 of 3

Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2003 9:40 pm
by kiri
Have it waxed.

Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 9:27 am
by disaster
back hair is significantly harder to deal with, being as how it's quite difficult to see and/or reach without assistance. if you're in the type of relationship where you feel comfortable asking your significant other to help you remove your bakc hair, i'm guessing it's not a big problem in the first place

Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:58 am
by kiri
Often your SO will not admit they find it unattractive because of your feelings! But I'm the kind of person who would tell someone (cuz I'm brutally honest). I personally find it unattractive and would prefer they get it waxed. Hey, I have to shave my legs, bikini line and underarms, and wax/pluck my eyebrows - the least he can do is wax his back!

Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 12:31 pm
by Stars
But men are unattractive anyway, so how can a little extra hair make things worse? Don't you know that women are supposed to do all that work for us? jk :P

What about chest hair? You do know I am talking about men's chests, right?

Why am I forming all my sentences as questions?

(Wouldn't it be nasty to bring your new bride home, and on the honeymoon discover she has more chest hair (assuming you are male) than you do?)

Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 8:34 pm
by disaster
*shudder* that is about the most convincing argument for premarital sex that i've ever heard. ;) as for the waxing back hair thing, i'd have no problem waxing my back if my SO asked me to, i'd just ask for help due to the whole reach issue. legs and chest would take more convincing, and i can't really imagine why anyone would want a guy to shave/wax his chest. i mean, that hair is eventually going to come back, and the LAST thing i think a woman would want is whisker burns on her nipples from rubbing up against bristly new chest hair. much better to just let it grow out, even if it does tickle her nose when she rests on your chest it's better than the alternative imho

Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 12:10 pm
by Comatose
kiri wrote:Often your SO will not admit they find it unattractive because of your feelings! But I'm the kind of person who would tell someone (cuz I'm brutally honest). I personally find it unattractive and would prefer they get it waxed. Hey, I have to shave my legs, bikini line and underarms, and wax/pluck my eyebrows - the least he can do is wax his back!
On your advice I went for it. I shaved everything except the top of my head, all of my eye brows, my arms, and all of my legs. It was a long process, and yes some parts were harder than others were. Afterward it was very itchy. I don’t understand how women do it! After all that my SO says I liked you better with hair. :oops: I guess that will teach me to believe her.

OK. That isn't totally true. I exaggerated a little. You will have to guess what is exaggerated.

Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 6:09 pm
by Cord
Enjoy the grow-back process; the itchy feeling gets much worse. (Assuming less than 100% exaggeration, that is...)

Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 8:29 pm
by Stars
Kiri wrote:...(cuz I'm brutally honest).
I wish more people were. Is there really such a thing as a "good" lie?

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2003 1:07 pm
by Nyteshade
*begins to think Stars has his cookie*

Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2003 6:05 pm
by RadicalEd
I'd have to say the shaving of all your hair, i can understand chest, back, and "other" areas but do SO really like the arms and legs shaved too?